Sense through statistics

I normally blog or tweet when:

a. I have free time
and
b. I find something really interesting

Having said that, I recently analyzed my tweet frequency(http://tweetstats.com) and blog frequency.





Now, if you take a look at my tweet statistics, they peak on the months of October and November.And take a look at my blog posts. In the year 2008, September + October has seen 5 out of 14 posts. The average posts per month in 2008 was around 1.2.

From Sep 8, 2008 to November 8, 2008, I was doing my autumn internship as a part of curriculum. And it was this period that witnessed maximum tweets and blog posts which conveys I had free time and I found something really interesting. When I go back and see the subject of the tweets (and blogs), it's hardly connected to what I was working on. This means, I found something really interesting either in addition to my work or other than work.

In the essay, Good and Bad procrastination, Paul Graham argues
"There are three variants of procrastination, depending on what you do instead of working on something: you could work on (a) nothing, (b) something less important, or(c) something more important. That last type, I'd argue, is good procrastination."

As per this point, it becomes fairly clear that I wasn't tweeting and blogging in addition to my work because I would have ideally procrastinated these two activities. So it all falls into place. I didn't try to exit the subjectivity band and was totally falling in the 'in between ' region. And I even know why - I was not loving what I was doing.

Subjectivity, of sorts

Beauty is in the eyes of the beholder. It's just a matter of perception in deciding what is good and what is not. Subjectivity, we have come to see has become one word providing escapist route for average performances. When we start thinking about how people respond to things, more often than not ,subjectivity becomes a big bias. It's often an excuse when performance doesn't meet expectations. But are aspects of measurement, appreciation and selection really influenced by subjectivity to a great extent?

Art is one field that is heavily characterized by perception and subjectivity. But even in such a field we find exhibitions of perfection and beauty that goes beyond subjectivity and criticism. They just fall into the category of absolutes. When we take movies for example, The Shawshank Redemption is a great movie. I have never come across anyone who has watched that movie and felt it wasn't a good one. Similarly there are examples of bad movies - you yourself would have witnessed or check out IMDB's bottom 100. In fact there are three categories in which most things in life fall under - the really good, the really bad and in between. When something falls in the category of really good, it means that its greatness is appreciated even by people who don't have expertise in that particular field. You don't need to know the technicalities of cinematography, screen play and other finer aspects to appreciate The Shawshank. An average person watching the movie is often amazed by the movie. Similarly take the example of music. The Carnatic music is often considered to be elitist and only those who have a knowledge about the music are considered to appreciate it. But here again if you take the music of Mandolin Srinivas or Guitar Prasanna, it just transcends. Even a person who without Carnatic initiation is able to appreciate and enjoy it. You can expand the list easily - Sachin Tendulkar in Cricket, Richard Dawkins in religious philosophy, Da Vinci in being a polymath, Absolut in vodka and so on.

Usually most of the elements of a sample falls in the 'in between' category (the normal distribution is bell shaped). The gradient from good to bad is present only in this band. And you really don't know whether an element in this band is good or bad. Thus all fuzzy logic, the occurrence of alpha(the probability of rejecting a null hypothesis which is actually true) and beta (the probability of accepting a null hypothesis which is actually false)errors occur in this band. This band is the source of all debates, arguments and taking stands. When you fall out of this band, either to the left or to the right, life becomes very simple. You are almost always accepted or almost always rejected.

I'm tempted to say that the pursuit of excellence is to fall out of the gradient band and exit the realm of subjectivity.What I think helps you do this are:
1. Do what you love - Read http://paulgraham.com/love.html
2. Specialize extensively - Have a niche.
3. Don't always respond to expectations. Enjoy what you are doing.
4. Work with integrity. Be selective in what you are taking up and execute righteously.